From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752494AbaLSWEG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:04:06 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:63388 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751355AbaLSWEE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:04:04 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ulf Hansson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Russell King , Christian Daudt , Matt Porter , Kukjin Kim , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Maxime Ripard , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , Tony Lindgren , Ralf Baechle , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Mark Brown , Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , USB list , "lin ux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM: Eliminate CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:25:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1504884.AVoVpOfIGf@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7h1tnv2tu9.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <472992175.g1ArEYGFPo@vostro.rjw.lan> <9470157.PyHoGoSGz1@vostro.rjw.lan> <7h1tnv2tu9.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, December 19, 2014 01:49:34 PM Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > [...] > > > Fixed up patch is appended, thanks! > > > > > > --- > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Subject: PM: Eliminate CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > > > Having switched over all of the users of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME to use > > CONFIG_PM directly, turn the latter into a user-selectable option > > and drop the former entirely from the tree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > > I assume you're planning to get this in early in the v3.19-rc cycle, > correct? That way we can hopefully avoid conflicts with the various > defconfig changes we're taking through the arm-soc tree. I'm going to send a pull request with these changes tomorrow. > Also, thanks for taking care of all the tree-wide changes. This is a > great change. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.