From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753344AbcCUJzH (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:55:07 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:44928 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752002AbcCUJy5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:54:57 -0400 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Feng Xiao , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, wxt@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: rockchip: add driver Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1505152.fhSnu3pvDr@diego> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.14; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160321095049.GD27778@vireshk-i7> References: <1458303004-26445-1-git-send-email-xf@rock-chips.com> <1787319.AFAWVqkdk0@diego> <20160321095049.GD27778@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 21. März 2016, 15:20:49 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 18-03-16, 13:56, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Also, on both the rk3368 as well as the rk3399, you probably want the > > cluster- handling of arm-bL-cpufreq-dt. > > Contrary to its name it is _not_ limited to switching between clusters, > > but > > can also control frequencies of multiple cpu-clusters running at the same > > time. > > We aren't adding any new users to bL driver, please use cpufreq-dt as that > also supports multiple clusters now. I hadn't seen that yet ... nice that cpufreq-dt now also supports clusters :-) The other part still stands though, as we probably should register the platform-device somewhere else and not in some new special module. When everything is using cpufreq-dt now, I guess we could just add it to the core rockchip clk-code. Or was there some agreement where this should be done (obviously not the devicetree itself)?