From: Meng Xu <mengxu.gatech@gmail.com>
To: jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, coda@cs.cmu.edu,
codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: meng.xu@gatech.edu, sanidhya@gatech.edu, taesoo@gatech.edu,
Meng Xu <mengxu.gatech@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/coda: ensure the header peeked at is the same in the actual message
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:23:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505834623-37096-1-git-send-email-mengxu.gatech@gmail.com> (raw)
In coda_psdev_write(), the header of the buffer is fetched twice from the
userspace. The first fetch is used to peek at the opcode and unique id while
the second fetch copies the whole message. However, there could be
inconsistency in these two fields between two fetches as buf resides in
userspace memory and a user process can rush to change it across fetches.
Which means that the corresponding opcode and unique id fields in
req->uc_data could be different from what is fetched in for the first time.
Whether this double-fetch situation is a security critical bug depends on
how req->uc_data will be used later. However, given that it is hard to
enumerate all the possible use cases, a safer way is to ensure that the
peeked header is actually the same message header after the second fetch.
This patch enforces that the header of the message fetched into req->uc_data
is the same as what is fetched in originally. In other words, hdr.opcode and
hdr.unique do not change.
Signed-off-by: Meng Xu <mengxu.gatech@gmail.com>
---
fs/coda/psdev.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/coda/psdev.c b/fs/coda/psdev.c
index f40e395..b9dbdd8 100644
--- a/fs/coda/psdev.c
+++ b/fs/coda/psdev.c
@@ -178,6 +178,12 @@ static ssize_t coda_psdev_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * Override the request header to make sure that it matches the
+ * first fetch from buf
+ */
+ memcpy(req->uc_data, &hdr, 2 * sizeof(u_long));
+
/* adjust outsize. is this useful ?? */
req->uc_outSize = nbytes;
req->uc_flags |= CODA_REQ_WRITE;
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 15:23 Meng Xu [this message]
2017-09-24 2:35 ` Meng Xu
2017-09-26 19:35 ` Jan Harkes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505834623-37096-1-git-send-email-mengxu.gatech@gmail.com \
--to=mengxu.gatech@gmail.com \
--cc=coda@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meng.xu@gatech.edu \
--cc=sanidhya@gatech.edu \
--cc=taesoo@gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®