From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
lukasz.odzioba@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC V3 5/5] perf top: switch back to overwrite mode
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:23:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506370988-56587-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506370988-56587-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
perf_top__mmap_read has severe performance issue in
Knights Landing/Mill, when monitoring in heavy load system. It costs
several minutes to finish, which is unacceptable.
perf top was overwrite mode. But it is changed to non overwrite mode
since commit 93fc64f14472 ("perf top: Switch to non overwrite mode").
For non overwrite mode, it tries to read everything in the ring buffer
and does not check the messup. Once there are lots of samples delivered
shortly, the processing time could be very long.
Knights Landing/Mill as a manycore processor contains a large number of
small cores. Because of the huge core number, it will generated lots of
samples in a heavy load system. Also, since the huge sample#, the mmap
writer probably bite the tail and mess up the samples.
Switching to overwrite mode, which dropping the unsure mmap entries,
significantly speeds up the whole progress.
Considering the real time requirement for perf top, it should switch
back to overwrite mode.
Only warning once if the messup is detected.
Providing some hints to users.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
index 477a869..4b4af34 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int perf_top__start_counters(struct perf_top *top)
}
}
- if (perf_evlist__mmap(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, false) < 0) {
+ if (perf_evlist__mmap(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, true) < 0) {
ui__error("Failed to mmap with %d (%s)\n",
errno, str_error_r(errno, msg, sizeof(msg)));
goto out_err;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index 6a0d7ff..ef0b6b1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -723,7 +723,10 @@ perf_mmap__read(struct perf_mmap *md, bool check_messup, u64 start,
* In either case, truncate and restart at 'end'.
*/
if (diff > md->mask / 2 || diff < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data.\n"
+ "Please try increasing the period (-c) or\n"
+ "decreasing the freq (-F) or\n"
+ "limiting the number of CPUs");
/*
* 'end' points to a known good entry, start there.
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-25 20:23 [PATCH RFC V3 0/5] perf top optimization kan.liang
2017-09-25 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/5] perf tools: lock to protect namespaces and comm list kan.liang
2017-09-25 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/5] perf tools: lock to protect comm_str rb tree kan.liang
2017-09-25 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/5] perf top: implement multithreading for perf_event__synthesize_threads kan.liang
2017-09-27 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-25 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC V3 4/5] perf top: add option to set the number of thread for event synthesize kan.liang
2017-09-25 20:23 ` kan.liang [this message]
2017-09-25 20:36 ` [PATCH RFC V3 5/5] perf top: switch back to overwrite mode Andi Kleen
2017-09-27 12:00 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506370988-56587-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.odzioba@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome