mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, leedom@chelsio.com, Harsh@chelsio.com,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:55:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507035334.29211.105.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <644c3e01654f8bd48d669c36e424959d6ef0e27e.1506607370.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2284 bytes --]

On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 15:14 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The intel-iommu DMA ops fail to correctly handle scatterlists where
> sg->offset is greater than PAGE_SIZE - the IOVA allocation is computed
> appropriately based on the page-aligned portion of the offset, but the
> mapping is set up relative to sg->page, which means it fails to actually
> cover the whole buffer (and in the worst case doesn't cover it at all):
> 
>     (sg->dma_address + sg->dma_len) ----+
>     sg->dma_address ---------+          |
>     iov_pfn------+           |          |
>                  |           |          |
>                  v           v          v
> iova:   a        b        c        d        e        f
>         |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
>                           <...calculated....>
>                  [_____mapped______]
> pfn:    0        1        2        3        4        5
>         |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
>                  ^           ^          ^
>                  |           |          |
>     sg->page ----+           |          |
>     sg->offset --------------+          |
>     (sg->offset + sg->length) ----------+

I'd still dearly love to see some clear documentation of what it means
for sg->offset to be outside the page referenced by sg->page.

Or is it really not "outside", and it's *only* valid for the offset to
be > PAGE_OFFSET when it's a huge page, so we can check that with a
BUG_ON() ? 

In particular, I'd like to know what is intended in the Xen PV case,
where there isn't a straight correspondence between pfn and mfn. Is the
out-of-range sg->offset intended to refer to the next *pfn* after sg-
>page, or to the next *mfn* after sg->page? 

I confess I've only followed this thread vaguely, but I haven't seen a
*coherent* explanation except in the huge page case (in which case I
want to see that BUG_ON in the patch) of why this isn't just totally
bogus.

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 4938 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-28 14:14 Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 16:17 ` Casey Leedom
2017-09-28 13:29   ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-28 16:59     ` Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 15:43       ` Raj, Ashok
2017-10-03 19:36         ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-29  8:14 ` Harsh Jain
2017-09-29 16:18   ` Casey Leedom
     [not found]     ` <e2c92d3a-3d5d-a0eb-7d5f-a9453e48cfd5@chelsio.com>
2017-10-03 22:22       ` Casey Leedom
2017-10-03 12:55 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2017-10-03 18:05   ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-03 22:16     ` David Woodhouse
2017-10-04 11:18       ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-06 14:43     ` Joerg Roedel
2017-10-06 12:54       ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-06 18:47       ` Jacob Pan
2017-11-15 23:54         ` Jacob Pan
2017-11-16 21:32           ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-16 21:09             ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 16:18               ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-17 15:48                 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 17:44                   ` Casey Leedom
2017-11-17 18:09                     ` Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507035334.29211.105.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=Harsh@chelsio.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome