From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751862AbdJDEBi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 00:01:38 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:43537 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751396AbdJDDze (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 23:55:34 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,476,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="906475120" From: Ricardo Neri To: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Liang Z Li , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ricardo.neri@intel.com, Ricardo Neri , Adam Buchbinder , Colin Ian King , Lorenzo Stoakes , Qiaowei Ren , Nathan Howard , Adan Hawthorn , Joe Perches Subject: [PATCH v9 08/29] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:54:11 -0700 Message-Id: <1507089272-32733-9-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1507089272-32733-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> References: <1507089272-32733-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual volume 2A states that if a SIB byte is used and SIB.base is 101b and ModRM.mod is zero, then the base part of the base part of the effective address computation is null. To signal this situation, a -EDOM error is returned to indicate callers to ignore the base value present in the register operand. In this scenario, a 32-bit displacement follows the SIB byte. Displacement is obtained when the instruction decoder parses the operands. Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Adam Buchbinder Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Qiaowei Ren Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Nathan Howard Cc: Adan Hawthorn Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Ravi V. Shankar Cc: x86@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri --- arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c index 2ad1d4a..581a960 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c @@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs, case REG_TYPE_BASE: regno = X86_SIB_BASE(insn->sib.value); + /* + * If ModRM.mod is 0 and SIB.base == 5, the base of the + * register-indirect addressing is 0. In this case, a + * 32-bit displacement follows the SIB byte. + */ + if (!X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) && regno == 5) + return -EDOM; + if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value)) regno += 8; break; @@ -164,16 +172,22 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset); } else { if (insn->sib.nbytes) { + /* + * Negative values in the base and index offset means + * an error when decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM, + * which means that the registers should not be used + * in the address computation. + */ base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE); - if (base_offset < 0) + if (base_offset == -EDOM) + base = 0; + else if (base_offset < 0) goto out; + else + base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset); indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX); - /* - * A negative offset generally means a error, except - * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register - * should not be used as index. - */ + if (indx_offset == -EDOM) indx = 0; else if (indx_offset < 0) @@ -181,8 +195,6 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs) else indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset); - base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset); - eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib)); } else { addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM); -- 2.7.4