From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751510AbdJRKt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 06:49:27 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0172.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.172]:51669 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750880AbdJRKtV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 06:49:21 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:1963:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3743:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:4470:5007:6119:6742:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14181:14659:14721:21080:21433:21627:30012:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: part83_6de8754b11044 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2682 Message-ID: <1508323753.6806.5.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations From: Joe Perches To: Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com, julia.lawall@lip6.fr Cc: elfring@users.sourceforge.net, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, jsnitsel@redhat.com, kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, PeterHuewe@gmx.de, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 03:49:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1d3516a2-a8e6-9e95-d438-f115fac84c7f@users.sourceforge.net> <20171016183139.otyh3m5c5yurtmow@linux.intel.com> <20171016183512.3bz6x4b6lbhpbkje@linux.intel.com> <20171017085124.pkrjzghcf5wmcydc@mwanda> <1508255833.3129.33.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1508280210.6530.32.camel@perches.com> <1508318326.6806.1.camel@perches.com> <026d582729b849b780fbaa06fb8bc79e@infineon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 +0000, Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com wrote: > > For instance, nothing about > > > > sizeof(type) > > > > vs > > > > sizeof(*ptr) > > > > makes it easier for a human to read the code. > > > > > > If it does not make it easier to read the code for you, then maybe you > > > should consider that this might not be true for all humans. For me, it > > > makes it much easier to see at a glance, that code like > > > ptr=malloc(sizeof(*ptr)) is correct. > > > > I don't think there is a perfect solution. > > Maybe. But for the second variant the correctness is easier to check, How often should ptr = alloc(sizeof(*ptr)) be ptr = alloc(sizeof(**ptr)) > both mentally and programmatically, because there is no need for any context (the type of ptr does not matter). Context matters.