From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 09:43:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 09:42:55 -0400 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:3762 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 09:42:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15086.48447.264388.289216@charged.uio.no> Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 15:42:23 +0200 To: Ion Badulescu Cc: Alan Cox , Andrea Arcangeli , Subject: Re: 2.2.19 locks up on SMP In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15086.42872.321353.67228@charged.uio.no> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Ion Badulescu writes: > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> Did you apply the following patch which I put out on the lists >> a couple of weeks ago? > No, I was testing with 2.2.19 and then I started going back > into the 2.2.19pre series until I found the culprit. > I'll give your patch a spin tomorrow, after I catch some > zzz's. :-) Right you are. FYI I've now put up those patches of which I am aware against 2.2.19 on http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.2.19 I'll try to keep that area updated with a brief explanation for each patch... Cheers, Trond