From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: customized event_read for client IMC uncore
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:29:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509654593-4446-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
There are two free running counters for client IMC uncore. The custom
event_init() function hardcode their index to 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED' and
'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1'. To support the 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1'
case, the generic uncore_perf_event_update is obscurely hacked.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
introduced into generic code. For example, free running counter index.
Introduce customized event_read function for client IMC uncore.
The customized function is exactly copied from previous generic
uncore_pmu_event_read.
The 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1' case will be isolated for client IMC
uncore only.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
---
Change since V3:
- Use the customized read function to replace uncore_perf_event_update.
- Move generic code change to patch 3/8.
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
index db1127c..b6d0d72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
@@ -449,6 +449,35 @@ static void snb_uncore_imc_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
uncore_pmu_start_hrtimer(box);
}
+static void snb_uncore_imc_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
+ u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
+ int shift;
+
+ /*
+ * There are two free running counters in IMC.
+ * The index for the second one is hardcoded to
+ * UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1.
+ */
+ if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+ shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
+ else
+ shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
+
+ /* the hrtimer might modify the previous event value */
+again:
+ prev_count = local64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
+ new_count = uncore_read_counter(box, event);
+ if (local64_xchg(&event->hw.prev_count, new_count) != prev_count)
+ goto again;
+
+ delta = (new_count << shift) - (prev_count << shift);
+ delta >>= shift;
+
+ local64_add(delta, &event->count);
+}
+
static void snb_uncore_imc_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
@@ -471,7 +500,7 @@ static void snb_uncore_imc_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
* Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
* that we are disabling:
*/
- uncore_perf_event_update(box, event);
+ snb_uncore_imc_event_read(event);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
}
}
@@ -533,7 +562,7 @@ static struct pmu snb_uncore_imc_pmu = {
.del = snb_uncore_imc_event_del,
.start = snb_uncore_imc_event_start,
.stop = snb_uncore_imc_event_stop,
- .read = uncore_pmu_event_read,
+ .read = snb_uncore_imc_event_read,
};
static struct intel_uncore_ops snb_uncore_imc_ops = {
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-02 20:29 kan.liang [this message]
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: correct fixed counter index check for NHM kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: correct fixed counter index check in generic code kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: add new data structures for free running counters kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-14 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 5/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: add infrastructure for free running counter kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-15 15:53 ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 6/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: SKX support for IIO free running counters kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: expose uncore_pmu_event functions kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-02 20:29 ` [PATCH V4 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: clean up client IMC uncore kan.liang
2018-01-14 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17 2:18 ` [PATCH V4 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: customized event_read for " Liang, Kan
2017-11-17 8:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-11 13:53 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509654593-4446-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®