From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:05:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:05:32 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:41354 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 May 2001 16:05:21 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15097.41719.48461.215024@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT) To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: page_launder() bug In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15096.42935.213398.64003@pizda.ninka.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti writes: > You want writepage() to check/clean the referenced bit and move the page > to the active list itself ? Well, that's the other part of what my patch was doing. Let me state it a different way, how is the new writepage() framework going to do things like ignore the referenced bit during page_launder for dead swap pages? Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com