From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 15:39:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 15:39:15 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:44422 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 15:39:01 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15109.31311.679701.484140@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:38:55 -0700 (PDT) To: J Sloan Cc: Ronald Bultje , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux scalability? In-Reply-To: <3B0577E0.A4CAF354@mirai.cx> In-Reply-To: <990173560.6346.0.camel@adslgw> <990174686.12881.18.camel@tux.bitfreak.net> <3B0577E0.A4CAF354@mirai.cx> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org J Sloan writes: > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup > with a special web cache in front of iis. I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers got disqualified and aren't even mentioned on the SPEC site on the main tables anymore. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com