From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frv: fix build failure
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 05:02:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511499747.3843.9.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171123230137.GA4525@sudip-laptop>
Hi Sudip,
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 23:01 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:17:19PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sudip,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 22:10 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > The frv defconfig build is failing with the error:
> > > lib/mpi/mpih-div.o: In function `mpihelp_divrem':
> > > mpih-div.c:(.text+0x30c): undefined reference to `abort'
> > >
> > > The function 'abort' was never defined for the frv architecture.
> > > Create 'abort' as is done in other arch like 'arm' and 'unicore32'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > I'm seeing the same issue building for ARC from today's Linus' tree.
> > Maybe it worth implementing abort() as a weak function for every arch/platform
> > that doesn't have it explicitly defined? Otherwise we'll end-up with
> > useless code duplication.
>
> Do you mean define it for every arch or define it in a common place so
> that all arch can use it?
Essentially I'd prefer to have just 1 instance of this function.
In fact I'd even remove existing implementations in ARM, Unicore32 and M32R
and have a generic implementation as this function obviously has nothing arch-specific.
> I did a quick try with the attached patch on two different arch, one of
> them (m32r) has the 'abort' defined and the other (frv) was failing due
> to lack of abort, and they both built without any warnings or errors.
Well maybe add call to panic() there as well as it is done for ARM, unicore32 and M32R?
> But I am not sure if 'kernel/exit.c' is the right place for it.
> Any suggestion?
I guess it should be indeed something in "kernel/" and maybe your existing choice
of "kernel/exit.c" is not bad. Just send a patch to LKML and you'll get much better
guidance on that I guess :)
Anyways thanks for looking at this one.
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-24 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 22:10 Sudip Mukherjee
2017-11-23 17:17 ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-23 23:01 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2017-11-24 5:02 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2017-11-27 18:25 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-03 22:32 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2017-12-06 22:00 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-11-27 18:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511499747.3843.9.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome