mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JianKang Chen <chenjiankang1@huawei.com>
To: <mingo@kernel.org>, <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>, <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	<chenjiankang1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/kprobes: add re-register safe check for register_kretprobe()
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:25:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511785525-2894-1-git-send-email-chenjiankang1@huawei.com> (raw)

From: Chen Jiankang <chenjiankang1@huawei.com>

When there are two same struct kretprobe rp, the INIT_HLIST_HEAD()
will result in a empty list table rp->free_instances. The memory leak
will happen. So it needs to add re-register safe check by
__get_valid_kprobe().

However, current this is not safe for multi-threadings, because
there is still a chance to re-register kretprobe concurrently.
So I add a kretprobe_mutex lock to protect the INIT_LIST_HEAD;

And we use rcu read lock to protect the rcu list for __get_valid_kprobe

Signed-off-by: Chen Jiankang <chenjiankang1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index a1606a4..6e4e657 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
 
 /* This protects kprobe_table and optimizing_list */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(kretprobe_mutex);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
 static struct {
 	raw_spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
@@ -1947,6 +1948,13 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
 		rp->maxactive = num_possible_cpus();
 #endif
 	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&kretprobe_mutex);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (__get_valid_kprobe(&rp->kp)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&rp->lock);
 	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&rp->free_instances);
 	for (i = 0; i < rp->maxactive; i++) {
@@ -1954,7 +1962,8 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
 			       rp->data_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (inst == NULL) {
 			free_rp_inst(rp);
-			return -ENOMEM;
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto out;
 		}
 		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&inst->hlist);
 		hlist_add_head(&inst->hlist, &rp->free_instances);
@@ -1965,6 +1974,9 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
 	ret = register_kprobe(&rp->kp);
 	if (ret != 0)
 		free_rp_inst(rp);
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&kretprobe_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_kretprobe);
-- 
1.7.12.4

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-27 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27 12:25 JianKang Chen [this message]
2017-11-28 12:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1511785525-2894-1-git-send-email-chenjiankang1@huawei.com \
    --to=chenjiankang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®