From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] staging: lustre: obdclass: discard FS_NEEDS_DEV flag.
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:13:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151355960071.10227.7678385187334068429.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151355938405.10227.11903161187102828189.stgit@noble>
Lustre mounts do not need a dev, as we can see from lustre_mount()
calling mount_nodev(). So remove the flag which could cause
confusion elsewhere.
Also format lustre_fs_types so that fields line up.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
index 2a79a223b98a..d49dc72ccba2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
@@ -1230,11 +1230,11 @@ static void lustre_kill_super(struct super_block *sb)
/** Register the "lustre" fs type
*/
static struct file_system_type lustre_fs_type = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .name = "lustre",
- .mount = lustre_mount,
- .kill_sb = lustre_kill_super,
- .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .name = "lustre",
+ .mount = lustre_mount,
+ .kill_sb = lustre_kill_super,
+ .fs_flags = FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE,
};
MODULE_ALIAS_FS("lustre");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 1:13 [PATCH SERIES 2: 0/4] staging:lustre: improve mounting code NeilBrown
2017-12-18 1:13 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-12-18 1:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] staging: lustre: obdclass: remove vfsmount option from client_fill_super NeilBrown
2017-12-18 1:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] staging: lustre: obd_mount: fix possible race with module unload NeilBrown
2017-12-18 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] staging: lustre: obdclass: remove pointless struct lustre_mount_data2 NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151355960071.10227.7678385187334068429.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®