From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>,
"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:00:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513818046.2603.39.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171221000805.GC1084507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 16:08 -0800, tj@kernel.org wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:41:02PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 11:01 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Currently, blk-mq timeout path synchronizes against the usual
> > > issue/completion path using a complex scheme involving atomic
> > > bitflags, REQ_ATOM_*, memory barriers and subtle memory coherence
> > > rules. Unfortunatley, it contains quite a few holes.
> >
> > Hello Tejun,
> >
> > An attempt to run SCSI I/O with this patch series applied resulted in
> > the following:
>
> Can you please try the v3? There were a couple bugs that I missed
> while testing earlier versions.
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171216120726.517153-1-tj@kernel.org
Will do. But please Cc: linux-block in case you would post a v4 of this patch
series. I searched the linux-block folder of my mailbox for the latest version
of this patch series and that is how I ended up testing v2 instead of v3 ...
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 19:01 Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU Tejun Heo
2017-12-13 3:30 ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-13 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14 2:09 ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-14 17:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-14 18:14 ` tj
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 21:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-12 21:44 ` tj
2017-12-13 5:07 ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-13 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14 18:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-14 19:19 ` tj
2017-12-14 21:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-15 13:30 ` tj
2017-12-14 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-14 21:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-14 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 2:12 ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-15 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 15:14 ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-15 2:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-15 13:50 ` tj
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: use blk_mq_rq_state() instead of testing REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: make blk_abort_request() trigger timeout path Tejun Heo
2017-12-14 18:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-14 19:26 ` tj
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE usages from blk-mq Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 22:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-12 22:22 ` tj
2017-12-12 20:23 ` [PATCHSET v2] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Jens Axboe
2017-12-12 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-20 23:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-21 0:08 ` tj
2017-12-21 1:00 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513818046.2603.39.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®