From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: nVMX: initialize descriptor cache fields in prepare_vmcs02_full
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513860222-40944-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513860222-40944-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
This part is separate for ease of review, because git prefers to move
prepare_vmcs02 below the initial long sequence of vmcs_write* operations.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 8b6013b529b3..cc42994f4ba2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -10590,27 +10590,9 @@ static int nested_vmx_load_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3, bool ne
static void prepare_vmcs02_full(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
bool from_vmentry)
{
-}
-
-/*
- * prepare_vmcs02 is called when the L1 guest hypervisor runs its nested
- * L2 guest. L1 has a vmcs for L2 (vmcs12), and this function "merges" it
- * with L0's requirements for its guest (a.k.a. vmcs01), so we can run the L2
- * guest in a way that will both be appropriate to L1's requests, and our
- * needs. In addition to modifying the active vmcs (which is vmcs02), this
- * function also has additional necessary side-effects, like setting various
- * vcpu->arch fields.
- * Returns 0 on success, 1 on failure. Invalid state exit qualification code
- * is assigned to entry_failure_code on failure.
- */
-static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
- bool from_vmentry, u32 *entry_failure_code)
-{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
- u32 exec_control, vmcs12_exec_ctrl;
vmcs_write16(GUEST_ES_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_es_selector);
- vmcs_write16(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_cs_selector);
vmcs_write16(GUEST_SS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_ss_selector);
vmcs_write16(GUEST_DS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_ds_selector);
vmcs_write16(GUEST_FS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_fs_selector);
@@ -10618,7 +10600,6 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
vmcs_write16(GUEST_LDTR_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_ldtr_selector);
vmcs_write16(GUEST_TR_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_tr_selector);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_ES_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_es_limit);
- vmcs_write32(GUEST_CS_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_cs_limit);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_SS_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_ss_limit);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_DS_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_ds_limit);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_FS_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_fs_limit);
@@ -10628,15 +10609,12 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
vmcs_write32(GUEST_GDTR_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_gdtr_limit);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_IDTR_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_idtr_limit);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_ES_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_es_ar_bytes);
- vmcs_write32(GUEST_CS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_cs_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_SS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_ss_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_DS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_ds_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_FS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_fs_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_GS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_gs_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_LDTR_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_ldtr_ar_bytes);
vmcs_write32(GUEST_TR_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_tr_ar_bytes);
- vmcs_writel(GUEST_ES_BASE, vmcs12->guest_es_base);
- vmcs_writel(GUEST_CS_BASE, vmcs12->guest_cs_base);
vmcs_writel(GUEST_SS_BASE, vmcs12->guest_ss_base);
vmcs_writel(GUEST_DS_BASE, vmcs12->guest_ds_base);
vmcs_writel(GUEST_FS_BASE, vmcs12->guest_fs_base);
@@ -10645,6 +10623,40 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
vmcs_writel(GUEST_TR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_tr_base);
vmcs_writel(GUEST_GDTR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_gdtr_base);
vmcs_writel(GUEST_IDTR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_idtr_base);
+}
+
+/*
+ * prepare_vmcs02 is called when the L1 guest hypervisor runs its nested
+ * L2 guest. L1 has a vmcs for L2 (vmcs12), and this function "merges" it
+ * with L0's requirements for its guest (a.k.a. vmcs01), so we can run the L2
+ * guest in a way that will both be appropriate to L1's requests, and our
+ * needs. In addition to modifying the active vmcs (which is vmcs02), this
+ * function also has additional necessary side-effects, like setting various
+ * vcpu->arch fields.
+ * Returns 0 on success, 1 on failure. Invalid state exit qualification code
+ * is assigned to entry_failure_code on failure.
+ */
+static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
+ bool from_vmentry, u32 *entry_failure_code)
+{
+ struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+ u32 exec_control, vmcs12_exec_ctrl;
+
+ /*
+ * First, the fields that are shadowed. This must be kept in sync
+ * with vmx_shadow_fields.h.
+ */
+
+ vmcs_write16(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_cs_selector);
+ vmcs_write32(GUEST_CS_LIMIT, vmcs12->guest_cs_limit);
+ vmcs_write32(GUEST_CS_AR_BYTES, vmcs12->guest_cs_ar_bytes);
+ vmcs_writel(GUEST_ES_BASE, vmcs12->guest_es_base);
+ vmcs_writel(GUEST_CS_BASE, vmcs12->guest_cs_base);
+
+ /*
+ * Not in vmcs02: GUEST_PML_INDEX, HOST_FS_SELECTOR, HOST_GS_SELECTOR,
+ * HOST_FS_BASE, HOST_GS_BASE.
+ */
if (from_vmentry &&
(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS)) {
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-21 12:43 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nVMX: prepare_vmcs02 optimizations Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-21 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: VMX: split list of shadowed VMCS field to a separate file Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-21 22:51 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-21 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: track dirty state of non-shadowed VMCS fields Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-21 22:57 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-25 3:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-31 8:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-31 22:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-21 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-12-21 12:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: nVMX: initialize more non-shadowed fields in prepare_vmcs02_full Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-25 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-27 9:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-28 2:07 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nVMX: prepare_vmcs02 optimizations Wanpeng Li
2017-12-25 10:08 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-27 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-28 8:39 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-01-01 9:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-01 23:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-02 1:05 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-01-02 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513860222-40944-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®