From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:15:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:15:06 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:33715 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:14:48 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15145.6960.267459.725096@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Albert D. Cahalan" , Tom Gall Subject: Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses In-Reply-To: <3B2919B8.85D38801@mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <15145.1739.395626.842663@pizda.ninka.net> <200106141904.f5EJ4AD413350@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <15145.3254.105970.424506@pizda.ninka.net> <3B29137B.CA8442B8@mandrakesoft.com> <15145.5939.879723.656331@pizda.ninka.net> <3B2919B8.85D38801@mandrakesoft.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik writes: > ok with me. would bus #0 be the system or root bus? that would be my > preference, in a tiered system like this. Bus 0 is controller 0, of whatever bus type that happens to be. If we want to do something special we could create something like /proc/bus/root or whatever, but I feel this unnecessary. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com