From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:28:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:27:55 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:64455 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:27:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15155.14779.124958.686172@charged.uio.no> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:27:39 +0200 To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: [PATCH][RFC] inode->u.nfs_i allocated separately In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Alexander Viro writes: > Trond, could you review the patch below? I believe that it's > OK > wrt races around iget(), but I'd appreciate if you take a look > at it. It certainly doesn't suffer from the problem I raised last time, so at first glance, I'd say it's OK. I'll see if I can't dig up some dirt on it over the weekend though ;-). Cheers, Trond