From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:37:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:37:07 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:16787 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:36:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15155.54917.265529.994551@charged.uio.no> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:36:37 +0200 To: Christian Robottom Reis Cc: , , Subject: Re: [NFS] NFS Insanity, v2 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Christian Robottom Reis writes: > On 23 Jun 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> Is libgkcontents.so in use on the client? If so it's a known >> problem: mmap() screws up the page cache invalidation routine >> invalidate_inode_page(). If you do the untar on the client, >> then all will be fine... > Hah! Yeah, you're right; both times it happened because mozilla > was running at the time. I can't have it untarred on the client > because the client isn't on every day. It's a minor nuisance > now that I've understood it. > Is there a fix in the works for this? There are workarounds, but Linus isn't particular happy with them. It's therefore unfortunately still work in progress... Cheers, Trond