From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/pti updates for 4.15
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:15:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515964541.22147.81.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzeesnQt9WXdSV=b_78i4MQ+iw_njYd2CPMmVX3k=0dDQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]
On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 13:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good point. I'll queue a patch to that effect or do you just want
> > to do
> > that yourself?
> I don't think it's critical, and I don't care for rc8, so it's not
> timing-sensitive.
>
> Maybe David should do it as part of the "the compiler people changed
> the name of the thunks" series anyway, since now I think that
> RETPOLINE_CFLAGS test might want to be extended too (to see which
> _version_ of the thunks we need to export).
>
> Or maybe we'd just export the damn thunks under both names, just to
> allow people to use both versions of the compilers.
>
> Christ, what a mess.
No, screw that. We're updating, and there's only one version of
anything. Let's not mess around with compatibility for thunk names that
never made the light of day in either a GCC or a Linux (even -rc)
release.
> My "let's not warn" is not important, and the thunk naming thing
> should be resolved first. Gaah.
>
> So I think letting David worry about it sounds about right.
Thanks. :)
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-14 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 15:27 Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-14 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-14 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-14 21:15 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-01-14 23:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-14 21:33 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/retpoline: Remove compile time warning tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515964541.22147.81.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®