From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Disable cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() test if not load balancing
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:55:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515c439-32ef-4aee-9f69-c5af1fca79e3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzcoZj90XeYj3TzG@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
On 11/15/24 5:54 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> On 14/11/24 13:19, Waiman Long wrote:
>> With some recent proposed changes [1] in the deadline server code,
>> it has caused a test failure in test_cpuset_prs.sh when a change
>> is being made to an isolated partition. This is due to failing
>> the cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() check for SCHED_DEADLINE tasks at
>> validate_change().
> What sort of change is being made to that isolated partition? Which test
> is failing from the test_cpuset_prs.sh collection? Asking because I now
> see "All tests PASSED" running that locally (with all my 3 patches on
> top of cgroup/for-6.13 w/o this last patch from you).
The failing test isn't an isolated partition. The actual test failure is
Test TEST_MATRIX[62] failed result check!
C0-4:X2-4:S+ C1-4:X2-4:S+:P2 C2-4:X4:P1 . . X5 . . 0
A1:0-4,A2:1-4,A3:2-4 A1:P0,A2:P-2,A3:P-1
In this particular case, cgroup A3 has the following setting before the
X5 operation.
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus: 2-4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.exclusive: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.effective: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective: 4
A1/A2/A3/cpuset.cpus.partition: root
I believe this is fixed by my other change in the commit to change
arguments of cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() to use effective_cpus instead
as cpus_allowed may not represent what CPUs are currently used in the
partition.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 18:19 Waiman Long
2024-11-14 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-15 10:54 ` Juri Lelli
2024-11-15 17:55 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-11-18 9:39 ` Juri Lelli
2024-11-18 13:58 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-19 3:28 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-19 6:03 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515c439-32ef-4aee-9f69-c5af1fca79e3@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®