From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:19:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:38161 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:19:41 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 2002 22:11:10 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 12:19:31 +1000 Message-ID: <15163.1021688371@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 May 2002 22:11:10 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: >It just looks like you are failing to obtain guidance from Linus so _maybe_ >submiting multiple small patches that can be reviewed from within a mailer >might be easier for someone who already stated his preferences for that >matter. You still don't get it. Read my mail. "Before I send you the kbuild 2.5 patch, how do you want to handle it?". I am seeking Linus opinion on the next step, not sending the patch yet. -- Those that can, do. Those that can't, troll on linux-kernel.