From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
Klaus Dittrich <kladit@t-online.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.7p6 hang
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:30:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15180.32563.739560.194630@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010711175809.F3496@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <200107110849.f6B8nlm00414@df1tlpc.local.here> <shslmlv62us.fsf@charged.uio.no> <3B4C56F1.3085D698@uow.edu.au> <15180.24844.687421.239488@charged.uio.no> <20010711175809.F3496@athlon.random>
>>>>> " " == Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> writes:
> ksoftirqd is quite scheduler intensive, and while its startup
> is correct (no need of any change there), it tends to trigger
> scheduler bugs (one of those bugs was just fixed in pre5). The
> reason I never seen the deadlock I also fixed this other
> scheduler bug in my tree:
> --- 2.4.4aa3/kernel/sched.c.~1~ Sun Apr 29 17:37:05 2001
> +++ 2.4.4aa3/kernel/sched.c Tue May 1 16:39:42 2001
> @@ -674,8 +674,10 @@
> #endif
> spin_unlock_irq(&runqueue_lock);
> - if (prev == next)
> + if (prev == next) {
> + current->policy &= ~SCHED_YIELD;
> goto same_process;
> + }
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
I no longer see the hang with this patch, but I'm not sure I
understand why it works.
Does the above mean that the hang is occuring because spawn_ksoftirqd
is yielding back to itself? If so, the semaphore trick seems more
robust, as it causes a proper sleep until it's safe to wake up.
Cheers,
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-11 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-11 8:49 Klaus Dittrich
2001-07-11 12:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2001-07-11 13:38 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-11 14:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2001-07-11 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-11 17:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-07-11 18:33 ` Josh Logan
2001-07-11 19:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-11 19:28 ` Josh Logan
2001-07-16 19:16 ` Josh Logan
2001-07-16 19:34 ` David Ford
2001-07-16 21:07 ` Josh Logan
2001-07-11 19:27 ` David Ford
2001-07-12 0:17 ` Johan Kullstam
2001-07-11 16:30 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2001-07-11 16:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-11 15:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15180.32563.739560.194630@charged.uio.no \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=kladit@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®