mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/edid: drop the dcc probe before drm_do_get_edid
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:56:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518346607.8520.1.camel@v3.sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180210180355.2284-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 19:03 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Now that drm_do_get_edid() handles override and firmware EDIDs it makes
> no sense to conditionalize it with a DCC probe. On the contrary -- the
> overrides are useful specifically when DCC is not functioning.
> 
> drm_do_get_edid() already bails out when DCC fails, there's no need for
> an extra check. It seems entirely safe to just drop this.
> 
> Working around the issue by forcing the connector on is not a good
> solution because that way the desktop shell can't tell when a monitor is
> plugged in or removed.
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Fixes: 53fd40a ("drm: handle override and firmware EDID at drm_do_get_edid() level")

Please disregard this, should have given it more thought. Sorry.

It removes a symbol other modules use, and typoes DDC/DCC in the commit
message. Moreover it doesn't actually seem to solve my problem -- will
try to follow up with a better fix.

Lubo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-11 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-10 18:03 Lubomir Rintel
2018-02-11 10:56 ` Lubomir Rintel [this message]
2018-02-12  9:39   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1518346607.8520.1.camel@v3.sk \
    --to=lkundrak@v3.sk \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome