From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756516AbeBOW7C (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:59:02 -0500 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:33318 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756495AbeBOW7B (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:59:01 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Subject: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Work around usercopy check From: David Howells To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:59:00 +0000 Message-ID: <151873554032.16545.2581958777736418547.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Due to a check recently added to copy_to_user(), it's now not permitted to copy from slab-held data to userspace unless the slab is whitelisted. This affects rxrpc_recvmsg() when it attempts to place an RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID control message in the userspace control message buffer. A warning is generated by usercopy_warn() because the source is the copy of the user_call_ID retained in the rxrpc_call struct. Work around the issue by copying the user_call_ID to a variable on the stack and passing that to put_cmsg(). The warning generated looks like: Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'dmaengine-unmap-128' (offset 680, size 8)! WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1401 at mm/usercopy.c:81 usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... RIP: 0010:usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... Call Trace: __check_object_size+0x9c/0x1a0 put_cmsg+0x98/0x120 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6fc/0x1010 [rxrpc] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf8/0x240 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? finish_task_switch+0xa6/0x2b0 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xed/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x26/0x9b Reported-by: Jonathan Billings Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Kees Cook Tested-by: Jonathan Billings --- net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c index cc21e8db25b0..9d45d8b56744 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c @@ -517,9 +517,10 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, ret = put_cmsg(msg, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID, sizeof(unsigned int), &id32); } else { + unsigned long idl = call->user_call_ID; + ret = put_cmsg(msg, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID, - sizeof(unsigned long), - &call->user_call_ID); + sizeof(unsigned long), &idl); } if (ret < 0) goto error_unlock_call;