From: kpark3469@gmail.com
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
panand@redhat.com, keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: usercopy: implement arch_within_stack_frames
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:06:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523253969-31699-3-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523253969-31699-2-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
This implements arch_within_stack_frames() for arm64 that should
validate if a given object is contained by a kernel stack frame.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 177be0d..72d0747 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ config ARM64
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
select HAVE_KPROBES
select HAVE_KRETPROBES
+ select HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES
select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
select IRQ_DOMAIN
select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 33c4028..9918698 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
+#define FAKE_FRAME(frame, my_func) do { \
+ frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0); \
+ frame.pc = (unsigned long)my_func; \
+} while (0)
+
/*
* AArch64 PCS assigns the frame pointer to x29.
*
@@ -99,6 +104,77 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
}
}
+struct check_frame_arg {
+ unsigned long obj_start;
+ unsigned long obj_end;
+ unsigned long frame_start;
+ int discard_frames;
+ int err;
+};
+
+static int check_frame(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
+{
+ struct check_frame_arg *arg = d;
+ unsigned long frame_end = frame->fp;
+
+ /* object overlaps multiple frames */
+ if (arg->obj_start < frame->fp && frame->fp < arg->obj_end) {
+ arg->err = BAD_STACK;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Discard frames and check object is in a frame written early
+ * enough.
+ */
+ if (arg->discard_frames)
+ arg->discard_frames--;
+ else if ((arg->frame_start <= arg->obj_start &&
+ arg->obj_start < frame_end) &&
+ (arg->frame_start < arg->obj_end && arg->obj_end <= frame_end))
+ return 1;
+
+ /* object exists in a previous frame */
+ if (arg->obj_end < arg->frame_start) {
+ arg->err = BAD_STACK;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ arg->frame_start = frame_end + 0x10;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Check obj doesn't overlap a stack frame record */
+int arch_within_stack_frames(const void *stack,
+ const void *stack_end,
+ const void *obj, unsigned long obj_len)
+{
+ struct stackframe frame;
+ struct check_frame_arg arg;
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER))
+ return NOT_STACK;
+
+ arg.err = GOOD_FRAME;
+ arg.obj_start = (unsigned long)obj;
+ arg.obj_end = arg.obj_start + obj_len;
+
+ FAKE_FRAME(frame, arch_within_stack_frames);
+ arg.frame_start = frame.fp;
+
+ /*
+ * Skip 4 non-inlined frames: <fake frame>,
+ * arch_within_stack_frames(), check_stack_object() and
+ * __check_object_size().
+ */
+ arg.discard_frames = 4;
+
+ walk_stackframe(current, &frame, check_frame, &arg);
+
+ return arg.err;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
struct stack_trace_data {
struct stack_trace *trace;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 6:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] usercopy: reimplement arch_within_stack_frames kpark3469
2018-04-09 6:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] stacktrace: move arch_within_stack_frames from thread_info.h kpark3469
2018-04-09 6:06 ` kpark3469 [this message]
2018-04-09 6:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86: usercopy: reimplement arch_within_stack_frames with unwinder kpark3469
2018-04-09 7:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] stacktrace: move arch_within_stack_frames from thread_info.h kbuild test robot
2018-04-09 8:58 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523253969-31699-3-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com \
--to=kpark3469@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®