From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/atomic: Print debug message on atomic check failure
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:18:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524601089.24461.28.camel@dk-H97M-D3H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180411234302.2896-2-lyude@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 19:42 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Does what it says on the label, it's a little confusing debugging atomic
> check failures otherwise.
>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 7d25c42f22db..972a7e9634ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -1705,8 +1705,11 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> if (config->funcs->atomic_check)
> ret = config->funcs->atomic_check(state->dev, state);
>
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("atomic driver check for %p failed: %d\n",
> + state, ret);
> return ret;
> + }
>
nit: Would have slightly looked better if the 'ret' check was moved
inside the branch for funcs->atomic_check.
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> if (!state->allow_modeset) {
> for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-11 23:42 [PATCH v8 00/10] drm/i915: Implement proper fallback training for MST Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/atomic: Print debug message on atomic check failure Lyude Paul
2018-04-24 20:18 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] drm/i915: Move DP modeset retry work into intel_dp Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] drm/dp_mst: Fix naming on drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state() Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] drm/dp_mst: Remove all evil duplicate state pointers Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] drm/dp_mst: Make drm_dp_mst_topology_state subclassable Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] drm/dp_mst: Add reset_state callback to topology mgr Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] drm/i915: Only use one link bw config for MST topologies Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] drm/i915: Make intel_dp_mst_atomic_check() idempotent Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] drm/dp_mst: Add MST fallback retraining helpers Lyude Paul
2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] drm/i915: Implement proper fallback training for MST Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524601089.24461.28.camel@dk-H97M-D3H \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®