From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH V7 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Customized event_read() for client IMC uncore
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 11:25:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525371913-10597-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
There are two free-running counters for client IMC uncore. The
customized event_init() function hard codes their index to
'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED' and 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1'.
To support the index 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1', the generic
uncore_perf_event_update is obscurely hacked.
The code quality issue will bring problems when a new counter index is
introduced into the generic code, for example, a new index for
free-running counter.
Introducing a customized event_read() function for client IMC uncore.
The customized function is copied from previous generic
uncore_pmu_event_read().
The index 'UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1' will be isolated for client IMC
uncore only.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
Changes since V6
- Refine changelog
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
index aee5e84..df53521 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c
@@ -450,6 +450,35 @@ static void snb_uncore_imc_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
uncore_pmu_start_hrtimer(box);
}
+static void snb_uncore_imc_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
+ u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
+ int shift;
+
+ /*
+ * There are two free running counters in IMC.
+ * The index for the second one is hardcoded to
+ * UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 1.
+ */
+ if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+ shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
+ else
+ shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
+
+ /* the hrtimer might modify the previous event value */
+again:
+ prev_count = local64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
+ new_count = uncore_read_counter(box, event);
+ if (local64_xchg(&event->hw.prev_count, new_count) != prev_count)
+ goto again;
+
+ delta = (new_count << shift) - (prev_count << shift);
+ delta >>= shift;
+
+ local64_add(delta, &event->count);
+}
+
static void snb_uncore_imc_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
@@ -472,7 +501,7 @@ static void snb_uncore_imc_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
* Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
* that we are disabling:
*/
- uncore_perf_event_update(box, event);
+ snb_uncore_imc_event_read(event);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
}
}
@@ -534,7 +563,7 @@ static struct pmu snb_uncore_imc_pmu = {
.del = snb_uncore_imc_event_del,
.start = snb_uncore_imc_event_start,
.stop = snb_uncore_imc_event_stop,
- .read = uncore_pmu_event_read,
+ .read = snb_uncore_imc_event_read,
};
static struct intel_uncore_ops snb_uncore_imc_ops = {
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-03 18:25 kan.liang [this message]
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check for NHM kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:30 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:31 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add new data structures for free running counters kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:31 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 5/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add infrastructure for free running counter kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add infrastructure for free running counters tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 6/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support IIO free-running counters on SKX kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:32 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Expose uncore_pmu_event functions kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:33 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Expose uncore_pmu_event*() functions tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-03 18:25 ` [RESEND PATCH V7 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Clean up client IMC uncore kan.liang
2018-05-31 12:33 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-05-31 12:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Introduce customized event_read() for " tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1525371913-10597-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®