From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] staging: lustre: lu_object: discard extra lru count.
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 10:54:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152565448808.30131.17399451482748227169.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152565436690.30131.2229703651041382739.stgit@noble>
lu_object maintains 2 lru counts.
One is a per-bucket lsb_lru_len.
The other is the per-cpu ls_lru_len_counter.
The only times the per-bucket counters are use are:
- a debug message when an object is added
- in lu_site_stats_get when all the counters are combined.
The debug message is not essential, and the per-cpu counter
can be used to get the combined total.
So discard the per-bucket lsb_lru_len.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 27 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
index 83dacc413c32..bf5b309edeae 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
@@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
struct lu_site_bkt_data {
- /**
- * number of object in this bucket on the lsb_lru list.
- */
- long lsb_lru_len;
/**
* LRU list, updated on each access to object. Protected by
* bucket lock of lu_site::ls_obj_hash.
@@ -188,10 +184,9 @@ void lu_object_put(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_object *o)
if (!lu_object_is_dying(top)) {
LASSERT(list_empty(&top->loh_lru));
list_add_tail(&top->loh_lru, &bkt->lsb_lru);
- bkt->lsb_lru_len++;
percpu_counter_inc(&site->ls_lru_len_counter);
- CDEBUG(D_INODE, "Add %p to site lru. hash: %p, bkt: %p, lru_len: %ld\n",
- o, site->ls_obj_hash, bkt, bkt->lsb_lru_len);
+ CDEBUG(D_INODE, "Add %p to site lru. hash: %p, bkt: %p\n",
+ o, site->ls_obj_hash, bkt);
cfs_hash_bd_unlock(site->ls_obj_hash, &bd, 1);
return;
}
@@ -239,7 +234,6 @@ void lu_object_unhash(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_object *o)
list_del_init(&top->loh_lru);
bkt = cfs_hash_bd_extra_get(obj_hash, &bd);
- bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
percpu_counter_dec(&site->ls_lru_len_counter);
}
cfs_hash_bd_del_locked(obj_hash, &bd, &top->loh_hash);
@@ -423,7 +417,6 @@ int lu_site_purge_objects(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_site *s,
cfs_hash_bd_del_locked(s->ls_obj_hash,
&bd2, &h->loh_hash);
list_move(&h->loh_lru, &dispose);
- bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
percpu_counter_dec(&s->ls_lru_len_counter);
if (did_sth == 0)
did_sth = 1;
@@ -622,7 +615,6 @@ static struct lu_object *htable_lookup(struct lu_site *s,
lprocfs_counter_incr(s->ls_stats, LU_SS_CACHE_HIT);
if (!list_empty(&h->loh_lru)) {
list_del_init(&h->loh_lru);
- bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
percpu_counter_dec(&s->ls_lru_len_counter);
}
return lu_object_top(h);
@@ -1835,19 +1827,24 @@ struct lu_site_stats {
unsigned int lss_busy;
};
-static void lu_site_stats_get(struct cfs_hash *hs,
+static void lu_site_stats_get(const struct lu_site *s,
struct lu_site_stats *stats, int populated)
{
+ struct cfs_hash *hs = s->ls_obj_hash;
struct cfs_hash_bd bd;
unsigned int i;
+ /*
+ * percpu_counter_sum_positive() won't accept a const pointer
+ * as it does modify the struct by taking a spinlock
+ */
+ struct lu_site *s2 = (struct lu_site *)s;
+ stats->lss_busy += cfs_hash_size_get(hs) -
+ percpu_counter_sum_positive(&s2->ls_lru_len_counter);
cfs_hash_for_each_bucket(hs, &bd, i) {
- struct lu_site_bkt_data *bkt = cfs_hash_bd_extra_get(hs, &bd);
struct hlist_head *hhead;
cfs_hash_bd_lock(hs, &bd, 1);
- stats->lss_busy +=
- cfs_hash_bd_count_get(&bd) - bkt->lsb_lru_len;
stats->lss_total += cfs_hash_bd_count_get(&bd);
stats->lss_max_search = max((int)stats->lss_max_search,
cfs_hash_bd_depmax_get(&bd));
@@ -2040,7 +2037,7 @@ int lu_site_stats_print(const struct lu_site *s, struct seq_file *m)
struct lu_site_stats stats;
memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
- lu_site_stats_get(s->ls_obj_hash, &stats, 1);
+ lu_site_stats_get(s, &stats, 1);
seq_printf(m, "%d/%d %d/%ld %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
stats.lss_busy,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 0:54 [PATCH 00/10 - v2] staging: lustre: assorted improvements NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging: lustre: fix error deref in ll_splice_alias() NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] staging: lustre: make struct lu_site_bkt_data private NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging: lustre: move misc-device registration closer to related code NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] staging: lustre: ldlm: store name directly in namespace NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: lustre: llite: use more private data in dump_pgcache NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] staging: lustre: fold lu_object_new() into lu_object_find_at() NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] staging: lustre: lu_object: move retry logic inside htable_lookup NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging: lustre: move remaining code from linux-module.c to module.c NeilBrown
2018-05-07 0:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: lustre: llite: remove redundant lookup in dump_pgcache NeilBrown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-01 3:52 [PATCH 00/10] staging: lustre: assorted improvements NeilBrown
2018-05-01 3:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] staging: lustre: lu_object: discard extra lru count NeilBrown
2018-05-01 4:19 ` Dilger, Andreas
2018-05-04 0:08 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152565448808.30131.17399451482748227169.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®