mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arvind.chauhan@arm.com,
	inderpal.s@samsung.com, nm@ti.com, chander.kashyap@linaro.org,
	pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/8] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:41:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525676.DA5e83Tunr@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce68a1ba333ab080a2428242d8fa4d4629064a4d.1401191054.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 05:20:53 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Drivers expecting CPU's OPPs from device tree initialize OPP table themselves by
> calling of_init_opp_table() and there is nothing driver specific in that. They
> all do it in the same redundant way.
> 
> It would be better if we can get rid of redundancy by initializing CPU OPPs from
> CPU core code for all CPUs (that have a "operating-points" property defined in
> their node).
> 
> This patch calls of_init_opp_table() right after CPU device is registered in
> register_cpu(). of_init_opp_table() also has a dummy implementation which simply
> returns -ENOSYS when CONFIG_OPP or CONFIG_OF isn't supported by some platform.
> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/cpu.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 006b1bc..790183f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  
>  #include "base.h"
>  
> @@ -349,10 +350,12 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
>  	if (cpu->hotpluggable)
>  		cpu->dev.groups = hotplugable_cpu_attr_groups;
>  	error = device_register(&cpu->dev);
> -	if (!error)
> -		per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
> -	if (!error)
> -		register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
> +	register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
> +	of_init_opp_table(&cpu->dev);

Having thought a bit more about that I don't really like this.

In the ACPI land we have a processor driver that binds to CPU devices and
carries out similar initialization.  I kind of prefer that to littering
core code with platform-specific stuff.

Rafael


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-06 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-27 11:50 [PATCH V4 0/8] " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 1/8] opp: of_init_opp_table(): return -ENOSYS when feature isn't implemented Viresh Kumar
2014-05-29 22:19   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 2/8] opp: call of_node_{get|put}() from of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-29 22:32   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-05-30  6:33   ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-30 12:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-02  6:59   ` [PATCH V5 " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 3/8] opp: Enhance debug messages in of_init_opp_table() Viresh Kumar
2014-05-29 22:33   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-06-02  7:00   ` [PATCH V5 " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 4/8] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table Viresh Kumar
2014-05-29 22:41   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-06-02  6:37     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-06 21:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 5/8] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 6/8] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 7/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 11:50 ` [PATCH V4 8/8] cpufreq: exynos5440: " Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1525676.DA5e83Tunr@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
    --cc=arvind.chauhan@arm.com \
    --cc=chander.kashyap@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®