From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Boris Lukashev <blukashev@sempervictus.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alex.popov@linux.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 4/6] lkdtm: Add a test for STACKLEAK
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 19:28:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526488097-20611-5-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526488097-20611-1-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com>
Introduce lkdtm tests for the STACKLEAK feature.
First, all of them check that the current task stack is properly erased
(filled with STACKLEAK_POISON).
STACKLEAK_DEEP_RECURSION tests that exhausting the current task stack
with deep recursion is detected by CONFIG_VMAP_STACK (which is implied
by CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK).
STACKLEAK_BIG_ALLOCA and STACKLEAK_RECURSION_WITH_ALLOCA test that
alloca calls which overflow the kernel stack hit BUG()/panic() in
check_alloca().
Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
---
drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c | 3 +
drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h | 5 ++
drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile
index 3370a41..951c984 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += perms.o
lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += refcount.o
lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += rodata_objcopy.o
lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += usercopy.o
+lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += stackleak.o
+KASAN_SANITIZE_stackleak.o := n
KCOV_INSTRUMENT_rodata.o := n
OBJCOPYFLAGS :=
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
index 2154d1b..9d0324a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ static const struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
+ CRASHTYPE(STACKLEAK_BIG_ALLOCA),
+ CRASHTYPE(STACKLEAK_DEEP_RECURSION),
+ CRASHTYPE(STACKLEAK_RECURSION_WITH_ALLOCA),
};
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
index 9e513dc..865a6c3 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
@@ -83,4 +83,9 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
+/* lkdtm_stackleak.c */
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_BIG_ALLOCA(void);
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_DEEP_RECURSION(void);
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_RECURSION_WITH_ALLOCA(void);
+
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8422e8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * This code tests several aspects of the STACKLEAK feature:
+ * - the current task stack is properly erased (filled with STACKLEAK_POISON);
+ * - exhausting the current task stack with deep recursion is detected by
+ * CONFIG_VMAP_STACK (which is implied by CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK);
+ * - alloca calls which overflow the kernel stack hit BUG()/panic() in
+ * check_alloca().
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
+ * Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
+ */
+
+#include "lkdtm.h"
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
+static noinline bool stack_is_erased(void)
+{
+ unsigned long *sp, left, found, i;
+ const unsigned long check_depth = STACKLEAK_POISON_CHECK_DEPTH /
+ sizeof(unsigned long);
+
+ /*
+ * For the details about the alignment of the poison values, see
+ * the comment in track_stack().
+ */
+ sp = PTR_ALIGN(&i, sizeof(unsigned long));
+
+ left = ((unsigned long)sp & (THREAD_SIZE - 1)) / sizeof(unsigned long);
+ sp--;
+
+ /*
+ * One long int at the bottom of the thread stack is reserved
+ * and not poisoned.
+ */
+ if (left > 1)
+ left--;
+ else
+ return false;
+
+ pr_info("checking unused part of the thread stack (%lu bytes)...\n",
+ left * sizeof(unsigned long));
+
+ /*
+ * Search for check_depth poison values in a row (just like
+ * erase_kstack() does).
+ */
+ for (i = 0, found = 0; i < left && found <= check_depth; i++) {
+ if (*(sp - i) == STACKLEAK_POISON)
+ found++;
+ else
+ found = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (found <= check_depth) {
+ pr_err("FAIL: thread stack is not erased (checked %lu bytes)\n",
+ i * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("first %lu bytes are unpoisoned\n",
+ (i - found) * sizeof(unsigned long));
+
+ /* The rest of thread stack should be erased */
+ for (; i < left; i++) {
+ if (*(sp - i) != STACKLEAK_POISON) {
+ pr_err("FAIL: thread stack is NOT properly erased\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pr_info("the rest of the thread stack is properly erased\n");
+ return true;
+}
+
+static noinline void do_alloca(unsigned long size)
+{
+ char buf[size];
+
+ /* So this doesn't get inlined or optimized out */
+ snprintf(buf, size, "testing alloca...\n");
+}
+
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_BIG_ALLOCA(void)
+{
+ if (!stack_is_erased())
+ return;
+
+ pr_info("try a small alloca of 16 bytes...\n");
+ do_alloca(16);
+ pr_info("small alloca is successful\n");
+
+ pr_info("try alloca over the thread stack boundary...\n");
+ do_alloca(THREAD_SIZE);
+ pr_err("FAIL: alloca over the thread stack boundary is not detected\n");
+}
+
+static noinline unsigned long recursion(unsigned long prev_sp, bool with_alloca)
+{
+ char buf[400];
+ unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)&sp;
+
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "testing deep recursion...\n");
+
+ if (with_alloca)
+ do_alloca(400);
+
+ if (prev_sp < sp + THREAD_SIZE)
+ sp = recursion(prev_sp, with_alloca);
+
+ return sp;
+}
+
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_DEEP_RECURSION(void)
+{
+ unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)&sp;
+
+ if (!stack_is_erased())
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Overflow the thread stack using deep recursion. It should hit the
+ * guard page provided by CONFIG_VMAP_STACK (which is implied by
+ * CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK).
+ */
+ pr_info("try to overflow the thread stack using deep recursion...\n");
+ pr_err("FAIL: stack depth overflow (%lu bytes) is not detected\n",
+ sp - recursion(sp, 0));
+}
+
+void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_RECURSION_WITH_ALLOCA(void)
+{
+ unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)&sp;
+
+ if (!stack_is_erased())
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Overflow the thread stack using deep recursion with alloca.
+ * It should hit BUG()/panic() in check_alloca().
+ */
+ pr_info("try to overflow the thread stack using recursion & alloca\n");
+ recursion(sp, 1);
+ pr_err("FAIL: stack depth overflow is not detected\n");
+}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 16:28 [PATCH v12 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for it Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 16:28 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] gcc-plugins: Clean up the cgraph_create_edge* macros Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 16:28 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] x86/entry: Add STACKLEAK erasing the kernel stack at the end of syscalls Alexander Popov
2018-05-18 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 21:12 ` Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 16:28 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] gcc-plugins: Add STACKLEAK plugin for tracking the kernel stack Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 16:28 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2018-05-16 16:28 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 16:28 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] doc: self-protection: Add information about STACKLEAK feature Alexander Popov
2018-05-16 23:32 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for it Kees Cook
2018-05-18 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 18:10 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1526488097-20611-5-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=blukashev@sempervictus.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®