From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:23 -0400 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:1233 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <15280.57166.621818.388973@charged.uio.no> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:47:26 +0200 To: Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: all files are executable in vfat In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid From: Trond Myklebust User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Alexander Viro writes: > On 25 Sep 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> Yes *please*! Finally we could introduce proper support for >> 64-bit inode numbers too! > Right. As soon as userland is audited for places where it uses > int for storing inode numbers - just a couple of months after > MS fixes all security holes in their software. By then we'll > need 128bit time_t, though... Anybody using the fstat64() interface has of course already done this, and MS are known to be releasing the highly secure Windoze-XP any day now... I think I could find a use for the larger time_t too... Cheers, Trond