mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@lge.com.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@lge.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] panic: move bust_spinlocks(0) after console_flush_on_panic() to avoid deadlocks
Date: Tue,  5 Jun 2018 11:19:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528165248-17914-1-git-send-email-hoeun.ryu@lge.com.com> (raw)

From: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@lge.com>

 Many console device drivers hold the uart_port->lock spinlock with irq disabled
(using spin_lock_irqsave()) while the device drivers are writing characters to their
devices, but the device drivers just try to hold the spin lock (using
spin_trylock_irqsave()) instead if "oops_in_progress" is equal or greater than 1 to
avoid deadlocks.

 There is a case ocurring a deadlock related to the lock and oops_in_progress. If the
kernel lockup detector calls panic() while the device driver is holding the lock,
it can cause a deadlock because panic() eventually calls console_unlock() and tries
to hold the lock. Here is an example.

 CPU0

 local_irq_save()
 .
 foo()
 bar()
 .						// foo() + bar() takes long time
 printk()
   console_unlock()
     call_console_drivers()			// close to watchdog threshold
       some_slow_console_device_write()		// device driver code
         spin_lock_irqsave(uart->lock)		// acquire uart spin lock
           slow-write()
             watchdog_overflow_callback()	// watchdog expired and call panic()
               panic()
                 bust_spinlocks(0)		// now, oops_in_progress = 0
                   console_flush_on_panic()
                     console_unlock()
                       call_console_drivers()
                         some_slow_console_device_write()
                           spin_lock_irqsave(uart->lock)
                           ^^^^ deadlock	// we can use spin_trylock_irqsave()

 console_flush_on_panic() is called in panic() and it eventually holds the uart
lock but the lock is held by the preempted CPU (the same CPU in NMI context) and it is
a deadlock.
 By moving bust_spinlocks(0) after console_flush_on_panic(), let the console device
drivers think the Oops is still in progress to call spin_trylock_irqsave() instead of
spin_lock_irqsave() to avoid the deadlock.

 CPU0

 watchdog_overflow_callback()			// watchdog expired and call panic()
   panic()
     console_flush_on_panic()
       console_unlock()
         call_console_drivers()
           some_slow_console_device_write()
             spin_trylock_irqsave(uart->lock)	// oops_in_progress = 1
             ^^^^ use trylock, no deadlock
     bust_spinlocks(0)				// now, oops_in_progress = 0

Signed-off-by: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@lge.com>
---
 v2: fix commit message on the reason of a deadlock, no code change.

 kernel/panic.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 42e4874..b4063b6 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -233,8 +233,6 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
 	if (_crash_kexec_post_notifiers)
 		__crash_kexec(NULL);
 
-	bust_spinlocks(0);
-
 	/*
 	 * We may have ended up stopping the CPU holding the lock (in
 	 * smp_send_stop()) while still having some valuable data in the console
@@ -246,6 +244,8 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
 	debug_locks_off();
 	console_flush_on_panic();
 
+	bust_spinlocks(0);
+
 	if (!panic_blink)
 		panic_blink = no_blink;
 
-- 
2.1.4

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-05  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-05  2:19 Hoeun Ryu [this message]
2018-06-22  4:59 ` Hoeun Ryu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1528165248-17914-1-git-send-email-hoeun.ryu@lge.com.com \
    --to=hoeun.ryu@lge.com.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hoeun.ryu@lge.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®