From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:49:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:49:03 -0400 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:65434 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:48:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15283.4638.235617.873920@ns.caldera.de> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:48:46 +0200 (CEST) To: Ben Greear Cc: Steven Rostedt , Torsten.Duwe@informatik.uni-erlangen.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] mc146818rtc.h for user land programs (2.4.10) In-Reply-To: <3BB2036D.A72C1C25@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <3BB2036D.A72C1C25@candelatech.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid From: Torsten Duwe Reply-to: Torsten.Duwe@caldera.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ben> I can see arguing with Alan about the inclusion of linux-kernel Ben> headers in some cases, but I don't see anything in this file that Ben> looks like a user-space program could use. Which part of this file Ben> do the user space programs need? Don't want to add more spam; but since I was addressed personally I just want to state that I agree with Ben here, as well as Tim's answer about the fine nvram and rtc drivers. Torsten