From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA34C43141 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13BB20836 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D13BB20836 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932899AbeFTRDl (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:03:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:42212 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932808AbeFTRDi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:03:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5KGwxNn045418 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:03:38 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jqsvfk3qu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:03:37 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:03:36 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:03:33 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w5KH3Wcm30933120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:32 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E855A405B; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:54:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802E9A4059; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:54:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from srikart450.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.219.212]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:54:11 +0100 (BST) From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Thomas Gleixner Subject: [PATCH v2 07/19] sched/numa: Skip nodes that are at hoplimit Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:32:48 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1529514181-9842-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1529514181-9842-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062017-0008-0000-0000-00000249E9B7 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062017-0009-0000-0000-000021B03C91 Message-Id: <1529514181-9842-8-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-20_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806200187 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When comparing two nodes at a distance of hoplimit, we should consider nodes only upto hoplimit. Currently we also consider nodes at hoplimit distance too. Hence two nodes at a distance of "hoplimit" will have same groupweight. Fix this by skipping nodes at hoplimit. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25375.3 25308.6 -0.26 1 72617 72964 0.477 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 113372 108750 -4.07684 1 177403 183115 3.21979 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 414.64 819.20 556.08 147.70 -7.36% numa01.sh Sys: 77.52 205.04 139.40 52.05 67.10% numa01.sh User: 37043.24 61757.88 45517.48 9290.38 -5.06% numa02.sh Real: 60.80 63.32 61.63 0.88 -1.37% numa02.sh Sys: 17.35 39.37 25.71 7.33 -19.5% numa02.sh User: 5213.79 5374.73 5268.90 55.09 -0.62% numa03.sh Real: 780.09 948.64 831.43 63.02 -3.05% numa03.sh Sys: 104.96 136.92 116.31 11.34 4.591% numa03.sh User: 60465.42 73339.78 64368.03 4700.14 -2.72% numa04.sh Real: 412.60 681.92 521.29 96.64 -7.36% numa04.sh Sys: 210.32 314.10 251.77 37.71 41.74% numa04.sh User: 34026.38 45581.20 38534.49 4198.53 2.825% numa05.sh Real: 394.79 439.63 411.35 16.87 6.140% numa05.sh Sys: 238.32 330.09 292.31 38.32 -9.04% numa05.sh User: 33456.45 34876.07 34138.62 609.45 2.741% While there is a regression with this change, this change is needed from a correctness perspective. Also it helps consolidation as seen from perf bench output. Acked-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 23c39fb..ed60fbd 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static unsigned long score_nearby_nodes(struct task_struct *p, int nid, * of each group. Skip other nodes. */ if (sched_numa_topology_type == NUMA_BACKPLANE && - dist > maxdist) + dist >= maxdist) continue; /* Add up the faults from nearby nodes. */ -- 1.8.3.1