From: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
christoffer.dall@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, coltonlewis@google.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
darren@os.amperecomputing.com, vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Set ISTATUS for emulated timers, If timer expired
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:12:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152d262e-641d-4bb1-9656-a13e049d62c4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f6b2cb1-3d32-480a-9801-9b993ae74e2d@os.amperecomputing.com>
Hi Ganapatrao, Marc,
On 12/19/24 10:30 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> On 09-12-2024 11:04 pm, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 12/9/24 18:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:46:30 +0000,
>>> Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 12/9/24 16:39, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09-12-2024 06:50 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:25:34 +0000,
>>>>>> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> During automated testing of Nested Virtualization using
>>>>>>>>> avocado-vt,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is not merged upstream. So what branch are you using?
>>>>>>>> Based on
>>>>>>>> what kernel version? On what HW? With which virtualisation
>>>>>>>> features?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing is done on Ampere's AmpereOne platform using 6.10 based
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> with NV patches from your repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grmbl... *Which* patches? At least give me the SHA1 of the branch,
>>>>>> because I have no idea what you are running. And 6.10 is definitely
>>>>>> not something I care about. If you're using the NV patches, the
>>>>>> *minimum* you should run is 6.13-rc1, because that's what the current
>>>>>> code is based on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried 6.13-rc1 based nv-next branch today, which failed to boot
>>>>> UEFI as L1. Yet to debug this.
>>>>
>>>> I confirm am stuck with the same issue with nv-next on AmpereOne.
>>>
>>> All I can say is that it Works For Me (TM) on M2 and Snapdragon, using
>>> kvmtool, a fresh EDK2 built by Ard, and with the guest running purely
>>> VHE (FEAT_E2H0 not implemented).
>>>
>>> I haven't tried QEMU, I don't have an AmpereOne. I have also spent way
>>> too much time on this recently. So I'm afraid people interested in
>>> making this particular combination work will have to debug it.
>>
>> yes I do agree. I am currently setting up kvmtool to double check and I
>> will debug the qemu issue.
>
> I could boot Guest-hypervisor using QEMU with -bios and nv-next as L0
> with edk2 (QEMU_EFI.fd) built from upstream tree and fedora-41 as Guest-
> Hypervisor.
>
> The issue was disappeared when upgraded from fc39 to fc41. Same was
> experienced with the kvmtool boot as well(KVMTOOL_EFI.fd).
I also confirm that using a mailine edk2 fixed the issues I faced
previously (fed/rhel L1 guest not booting).
I used Marc's nv-next branch and qemu rebase.
With a rhel L1 guest I can now boot buildroot, debian and rhel guest as
L2 (feat mainline edk2). For rhel, I tested different kinds of page size
combinations for L1/L2 (4k and 64kB) and it worked.
I tested on AmpereOne and Grace-Hopper systems
Eric
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 5:32 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-12-09 9:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 12:25 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-12-09 13:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 15:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 15:39 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-12-09 15:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 16:46 ` Eric Auger
2024-12-09 17:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 17:34 ` Eric Auger
2024-12-19 9:30 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-12-19 12:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-14 13:12 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2025-01-14 14:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-14 14:57 ` Eric Auger
2025-01-14 15:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-16 17:52 ` Eric Auger
2025-01-16 18:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-07 17:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-07 18:09 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-07 18:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-07 19:08 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-10 18:26 ` Eric Auger
2025-02-11 19:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-15 17:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-18 7:33 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-02-18 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-18 21:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 6:10 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-02-10 13:18 ` Eric Auger
2024-12-10 12:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-12-09 19:36 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152d262e-641d-4bb1-9656-a13e049d62c4@redhat.com \
--to=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome