From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
songliubraving@fb.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 15:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530970783.4714.11.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530966399.4714.9.camel@gmx.de>
(bah, I see I replied to wrong patch version, but it's still valid)
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 14:26 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 10:29 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > index e59214ec52b1..c4073367219d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > @@ -718,14 +718,47 @@ void tlb_flush_remove_tables_local(void *arg)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + struct cpumask* lazy_cpus)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(mm)) {
> > + if (!per_cpu(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, cpu))
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, lazy_cpus);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > void tlb_flush_remove_tables(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > int cpu = get_cpu();
> > + cpumask_var_t lazy_cpus;
> > +
> > + if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), cpu) >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > + return;
>
> A put_cpu() went missing.
>
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&lazy_cpus, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> > + /*
> > + * If the cpumask allocation fails, do a brute force flush
> > + * on all the CPUs that have this mm loaded.
> > + */
> > + smp_call_function_many(mm_cpumask(mm),
> > + tlb_flush_remove_tables_local, (void *)mm, 1);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Ditto.
>
> -Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-07 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 14:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-30 4:30 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-29 16:56 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86,mm: restructure switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 16:49 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-29 17:29 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-07-07 12:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-07 13:39 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2018-07-07 21:21 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86,switch_mm: skip atomic operations for init_mm Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 17:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Dave Hansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-16 19:03 [PATCH v6 " Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 19:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 14:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 14:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 [PATCH v4 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 [PATCH 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530970783.4714.11.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome