From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
songliubraving@fb.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 17:25:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530998709.5350.32.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530951813.22672.10.camel@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2514 bytes --]
I. On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 10:23 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 17:56 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > The mm_struct always contains a cpumask bitmap, regardless of
> > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. That means the first step can be to
> > simplify things, and simply have one bitmask at the end of the
> > mm_struct for the mm_cpumask.
>
> Otherwise virgin master.today grumbles.
>
> CC kernel/bounds.s
> UPD include/generated/timeconst.h
> UPD include/generated/bounds.h
> CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> UPD include/generated/asm-offsets.h
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> HOSTCC usr/gen_init_cpio
> UPD include/generated/compile.h
> CC init/main.o
> In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:0,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:21,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
> from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:38,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7,
> from ./include/linux/preempt.h:81,
> from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
> from ./include/linux/seqlock.h:36,
> from ./include/linux/time.h:6,
> from ./include/linux/stat.h:19,
> from ./include/linux/module.h:10,
> from init/main.c:16:
> In function ‘bitmap_zero’,
> inlined from ‘cpumask_clear’ at ./include/linux/cpumask.h:378:2,
> inlined from ‘mm_init_cpumask’ at
> ./include/linux/mm_types.h:504:2,
> inlined from ‘start_kernel’ at init/main.c:560:2:
> ./include/linux/bitmap.h:208:3: warning: ‘memset’ writing 64 bytes
> into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-
> overflow=]
> memset(dst, 0, len);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't understand this one.
Inside init_mm we have this line:
.cpu_bitmap = { [BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)] = 0},
which is the way the documentation suggests statically
allocated variable size arrays should be allocated
and initialized.
How does that result in a memset of the same size,
on the same array, to throw an error like above?
What am I doing wrong?
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-07 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 21:56 [PATCH v4 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-07 8:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-07 21:25 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-07-08 14:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-08 14:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-09 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 3:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86,mm: restructure switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86,switch_mm: skip atomic operations for init_mm Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-16 19:03 [PATCH v6 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-08-04 22:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-07-10 14:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-15 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-15 23:50 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 1:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-06-29 14:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-30 4:30 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-20 19:56 [PATCH 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 21:32 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-21 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-21 0:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-22 15:10 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-22 17:45 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530998709.5350.32.camel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome