From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D9C7112C for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B4D20833 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TanxOYa1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 67B4D20833 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727614AbeJXRPn (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:15:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54766 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726720AbeJXRPn (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:15:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC352082F; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:48:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1540370911; bh=y31lbGR7M5y1Jpb5ePYvzy3YQsupQuhmUIWZnJor7gI=; h=To:From:In-Reply-To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:From; b=TanxOYa10yBUEjKtU7RCWFvdaKtHarrJ7Qqf5l3m1c22vJK/HZdN5ZhJqfPj03vui 5aFrxBLaKaAHGu6KKCYMG4jA+juPP+3jOvapaBV2lcs+Uy+Cd+ocequbEnRzvHqZNG hG9qJ5zlfRCJnmnfco/uBuXq+g1tfljkyUM41KB8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Catalin Marinas , Chen-Yu Tsai , David Airlie , Icenowy Zheng , Jagan Teki , Jernej Skrabec , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Michael Trimarchi , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Vasily Khoruzhick , Will Deacon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com From: Stephen Boyd In-Reply-To: <20181023155035.9101-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> Cc: Jagan Teki References: <20181023155035.9101-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181023155035.9101-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> Message-ID: <154037091085.53599.3262228306180990630@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.7 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] clk: sunxi-ng: Add check for minimal rate to NKM PLLs Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:48:30 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Jagan Teki (2018-10-23 08:50:22) > Some NKM PLLs doesn't work well when their output clock rate is set below > certain rate. > = > So, add support for minimal rate for relevant PLLs. > = > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > --- Acked-by: Stephen Boyd