Re: [PATCH] reset: Add reset_control_get_count()

[Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>]

On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 09:58 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:30 AM Ulrich Hecht <uli@fpond.eu> wrote:
> > On November 13, 2018 at 1:47 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> > > Currently the reset core has internal support for counting the number of
> > > resets for a device described in DT.  Generalize this to devices using
> > > lookup resets, and export it for public use.
> > > 
> > > This will be used by generic drivers that need to be sure a device is
> > > controlled by a single, dedicated reset line (e.g. vfio-platform).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > > ---
> > > See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1539003437.11512.20.camel@pengutronix.de/
> > > for the rationale to ensure a single, dedicated reset line.
> > > 
> > >  drivers/reset/core.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/reset.h |  7 +++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > index 654e20ff2d5da9d4..c32b755ec373c338 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> > > +/**
> > > + * of_reset_control_get_count - Count number of resets available with a device
> > 
> > Should be "reset_control_get_count", without of_ prefix.
> 
> Oops, thanks for catching!
> 
> Philipp: Do you want a v2 or incremental, or can you fix it up yourself?

No need, I'll fix it up.

thanks
Philipp