From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:37:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:37:14 -0500 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:6641 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:37:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15425.32621.987964.944902@charged.uio.no> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:37:01 +0100 To: Hans-Peter Jansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] some strangeness (at least) with linux-2.4.18-NFS_ALL patch In-Reply-To: <20020112224046.4205F1433@shrek.lisa.de> In-Reply-To: <20020111131528.44F8613E6@shrek.lisa.de> <20020112170111.12E601431@shrek.lisa.de> <15424.33959.99237.666877@charged.uio.no> <20020112224046.4205F1433@shrek.lisa.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Hans-Peter Jansen writes: > client: Athlon 1.2, Asus Via KT133, 768 MB Linux version > 2.4.18-pre3 (hp@elfe) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)) #3 > Sam Jan 12 21:26:40 CET 2002 mount opt: > rw,nodev,v3,rsize=4096,wsize=4096,soft,intr,udp,lock,addr=shrek > Any more ideas? What's wrong with my setup? 10 to 1 it's the 'soft' mount option. Cheers, Trond