From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>, <s-anna@ti.com>,
<xiaoxiang781216@gmail.com>, Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] remoteproc: fix recovery procedure
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:56:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547031403-34535-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
Commit 7e83cab824a87e83cab824a8 ("remoteproc: Modify recovery path
to use rproc_{start,stop}()") replaces rproc_{shutdown,boot}() with
rproc_{stop,start}(), which skips destroy the virtio device at stop
but re-initializes it again at start.
Issue is that struct virtio_dev is not correctly reinitialized like done
at initial allocation thanks to kzalloc() and kobject is considered as
already initialized by kernel. That is due to the fact struct virtio_dev
is allocated and released at vdev resource handling level managed and
virtio device is registered and unregistered at rproc subdevices level.
This patch initializes struct virtio_dev to 0 before using it and
registering it.
Fixes: 7e83cab824a8 ("remoteproc: Modify recovery path to use rproc_{start,stop}()")
Reported-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781216@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index 183fc42a510a..88eade99395c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
int ret;
+ /* Reset vdev struct as you don't know how it has been previously used */
+ memset(vdev, 0, sizeof(struct virtio_device));
vdev->id.device = id,
vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
vdev->dev.parent = dev;
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 10:56 Loic Pallardy [this message]
2019-01-12 18:28 ` xiang xiao
2019-01-14 20:23 ` Loic PALLARDY
2019-01-15 6:46 ` xiang xiao
2019-01-17 17:15 ` Loic PALLARDY
2019-01-21 12:44 ` xiang xiao
2019-01-21 13:51 ` Loic PALLARDY
2019-01-21 16:14 ` xiang xiao
2019-01-17 18:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-17 20:52 ` Loic PALLARDY
2019-01-17 21:44 ` Loic PALLARDY
2019-01-21 13:21 ` xiang xiao
2019-01-21 13:48 ` Loic PALLARDY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547031403-34535-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com \
--to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=xiaoxiang781216@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®