mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Michael Chan" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Ricardo Neri" <ricardo.neri@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/10] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap to unsigned long for better performance
Date: Fri,  1 Feb 2019 21:14:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1549084491-57808-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549084491-57808-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

A bit in reg_ch_conf_pending in wl271 and tmp_ch_bitmap is set atomically
by set_bit(). set_bit() sets the bit in a single unsigned long location. If
the variables are not aligned to unsigned long, set_bit() accesses two
cache lines and thus causes slower performance. On x86, this scenario is
called split lock and can cause overall performance degradation due to
locked BTSL instruction in set_bit() locks bus.

To avoid performance degradation, the two variables are aligned to
unsigned long.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c    | 3 ++-
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
index 903968735a74..8d15a6307d44 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
@@ -1707,7 +1707,8 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 {
 	struct wl12xx_cmd_regdomain_dfs_config *cmd = NULL;
 	int ret = 0, i, b, ch_bit_idx;
-	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2];
+	/* Align to unsigned long for better performance in set_bit() */
+	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
 	struct wiphy *wiphy = wl->hw->wiphy;
 	struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
 	bool timeout = false;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
index dd14850b0603..92d878f01fa5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
@@ -321,8 +321,10 @@ struct wl1271 {
 
 	/* Reg domain last configuration */
 	u32 reg_ch_conf_last[2]  __aligned(8);
-	/* Reg domain pending configuration */
-	u32 reg_ch_conf_pending[2];
+	/* Reg domain pending configuration. Aligned to unsigned long for
+	 * better performane in set_bit().
+	 */
+	u32 reg_ch_conf_pending[2] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
 
 	/* Pointer that holds DMA-friendly block for the mailbox */
 	void *mbox;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-02  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-02  5:14 [PATCH v3 00/10] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] Change document for " Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] x86/setcpuid: Add kernel option setcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-02-04 17:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-04 19:05     ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-04 19:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-04 20:46         ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-04 21:40           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-04 22:14             ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-05  6:10               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-04 23:24             ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-05  6:18               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 16:46                 ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-05 17:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-05  8:57               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-05 13:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-05  8:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-05 15:19             ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-05 15:43               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:26                 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-05 17:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-10 19:20                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-11 19:16                   ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-12 13:37                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-12 13:51                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-12 16:48                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-12 16:50                           ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-12 17:52                           ` Yu, Fenghua
2019-02-04 21:09       ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-05  8:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-05 15:21           ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-05 15:34             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] x86/split_lock: Define #AC for split lock feature Fenghua Yu
2019-02-04 18:41   ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-04 18:45     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-04 19:00       ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-04 19:03         ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-02  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-02-04 11:00   ` kbuild test robot
2019-02-04 14:43   ` kbuild test robot
2019-02-11 10:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 18:10     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-02-13  8:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-13 14:37         ` Yu, Fenghua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1549084491-57808-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome