Re: [RFC PATCH V2 9/9] tracing: Add timerlat tracer

[Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>]

On 5/14/21 10:55 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Just a couple of things I noticed while playing with this nice additon.
> 
> On 23/04/21 23:05, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> +/**
>> + * tlat_var_reset - Reset the values of the given timerlat_variables
>> + */
>> +static inline void tlat_var_reset(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct timerlat_variables *tlat_var;
>> +	int cpu;
>>  	/*
>>  	 * So far, all the values are initialized as 0, so
>>  	 * zeroing the structure is perfect.
>>  	 */
>> -	memset(osn_var, 0, sizeof(struct osnoise_variables));
>> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
>> +		memset(tlat_var, 0, sizeof(struct timerlat_variables));
>> +		tlat_var = per_cpu_ptr(&per_cpu_timerlat_var, cpu);
> 
> Think these two above want to be the other way around?

Arrrggg! :-) you are right...

>> +	}
>>  }
> 
> ...
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIMERLAT_TRACER
>> +static void timerlat_tracer_start(struct trace_array *tr)
>> +{
>> +	int retval;
>> +
>> +	if (osnoise_busy)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	retval = __osnoise_tracer_start(tr);
>> +	if (retval)
>> +		goto out_err;
>> +
>> +	osnoise_data.timerlat_tracer = 1;
> 
> It seems this needs to be set before calling __osnoise_tracer_start()?

Yep, my bad! two last minute cleanups that broke things...

I will change these two things in the v3.

Thanks!
-- Daniel

> Thanks!
> 
> Juri
>