From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] rxrpc: Get rid of conn bundle and transport structs [ver #2]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:06:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15528.1466611579@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146661137134.15011.10133465789054712595.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> The patches can be found here also:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=rxrpc-rewrite
>
> Tagged thusly:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> rxrpc-rewrite-20160622
Oops. I forgot to update the tag name. It's now:
rxrpc-rewrite-20160622-2
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-22 16:02 David Howells
2016-06-22 16:02 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] rxrpc: checking for IS_ERR() instead of NULL " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] rxrpc: fix uninitialized variable use " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] rxrpc: Use structs to hold connection params and protocol info " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] rxrpc: Replace conn->trans->{local, peer} with conn->params.{local, peer} " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] rxrpc: Fix exclusive connection handling " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] rxrpc: Pass sk_buff * rather than rxrpc_host_header * to functions " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] rxrpc: rxrpc_connection_lock shouldn't be a BH lock, but conn_lock is " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] rxrpc: Use IDR to allocate client conn IDs on a machine-wide basis " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] rxrpc: Validate the net address given to rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] rxrpc: Calls displayed in /proc may in future lack a connection " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] rxrpc: Make rxrpc_send_packet() take a connection not a transport " David Howells
2016-10-06 13:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-22 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] rxrpc: Provide more refcount helper functions " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] rxrpc: Kill the client connection bundle concept " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] rxrpc: Kill off the rxrpc_transport struct " David Howells
2016-06-22 16:06 ` David Howells [this message]
2016-06-26 20:02 ` [PATCH net-next 00/14] rxrpc: Get rid of conn bundle and transport structs " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15528.1466611579@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®