From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03497C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA5320848 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 02:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730706AbfCZCyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:54:43 -0400 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:34606 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727157AbfCZCyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:54:43 -0400 X-UUID: b9c9f0e3a10346899ef0cce6bdba3683-20190326 X-UUID: b9c9f0e3a10346899ef0cce6bdba3683-20190326 Received: from mtkcas36.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 843191351; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:54:37 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:54:36 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:54:35 +0800 Message-ID: <1553568875.21970.5.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: add pintcrl file From: Zhiyong Tao To: Rob Herring CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:54:35 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20190325193005.GA18114@bogus> References: <20190325122302.5483-1-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> <20190325122302.5483-3-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> <20190325193005.GA18114@bogus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 14:30 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 08:23:00PM +0800, Zhiyong Tao wrote: > > This patch adds pinctrl file for mt8183. > > Still has a typo in the subject. ==>we will change it in next version > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-pinfunc.h | 1120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 1120 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-pinfunc.h > > Add acks/reviewed-bys when posting new versions. This should also be > called v8 even though a different person sent it. ==>we will add acks/reviewed-bys when posting new versions in nxet version. This patch is based on "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814251/". If it is based on the patch "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814251/", it should called v8. But I send this patch, we call it v3. Because it it is based on the patch "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10836969/". In these v3 patches, we send 4 patches. So we should call 1/4,2/4,3/4 as v9 in next patch, and call 4/4 patch as v5. is it right? Thanks. > > Rob >