From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: u300: add missing check for kmalloc
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:14:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1555139666-948-9-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555139666-948-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
kmalloc return for bigrxbuf_virtual was not being checked - in case
of failure set status, cleanup bigtxbuf_virtual and baile out.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
Fixes: c7c8c78fdf6e ("ARM: 5667/3: U300 SSP/SPI board setup and test")
---
Issue found with experimental coccinelle script
Not sure about the checkpatch message:
CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!bigrxbuf_virtual"
#32: FILE: arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c:67:
+ if (bigrxbuf_virtual == NULL) {
As the current check for bigtxbuf_virtual uses == NULL that
was retained for consistency here.
Patch was compile tested with: u300_defconfig (implies MACH_U300_SPIDUMMY=y)
Patch is against 4.18 (localversion-next is next-20180824)
arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c b/arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c
index 68fe986..ff293ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c
@@ -62,7 +62,13 @@ static ssize_t dummy_looptest(struct device *dev,
status = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
+
bigrxbuf_virtual = kmalloc(DMA_TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (bigrxbuf_virtual == NULL) {
+ kfree(bigtxbuf_virtual);
+ status = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
/* Fill TXBUF with some happy pattern */
memset(bigtxbuf_virtual, 0xAA, DMA_TEST_SIZE);
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-13 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-13 7:14 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: imx legacy: cleanups Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM: hisi: fix of_iomap errors Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: add missing of_node_put() Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: hisi: fix error handling and missing of_node_put Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: imx: flag failure of of_iomap Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 1/4 RFC] ARM: imx legacy: warn on failed allocation Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: STi: at least warn if of_iomap fails Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH V2] ARM: STi: warn if scu mapping fails Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]
2019-04-23 10:26 ` [PATCH] ARM: u300: add missing check for kmalloc Linus Walleij
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH] ARM: ux500: add missing of_node_put() Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-15 9:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-04-16 11:49 ` Linus Walleij
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: hisi: check of_iomap and fix missing of_node_put Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-16 16:09 ` [2/3] " Markus Elfring
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: imx legacy: declare unsigned int rather than unsigned Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: hisi: handle of_iomap and fix missing of_node_put Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 3/4 RFC] ARM: imx legacy: wrap complex macro in () Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: imx legacy: add an SPDX license identifier Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-13 7:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM: imx legacy: cleanups Joe Perches
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-24 10:28 [PATCH] ARM: u300: add missing check for kmalloc Nicholas Mc Guire
2018-09-05 9:09 ` Linus Walleij
2018-09-05 11:20 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1555139666-948-9-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org \
--to=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®