mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Xiaoyao Li " <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"Christopherson Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Michael Chan" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 14/15] x86/split_lock: Disable split lock detection by kernel parameter "nosplit_lock_detect"
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:33:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556134382-58814-15-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556134382-58814-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

To work around or debug split lock issues, the kernel parameter
"nosplit_lock_detect" is introduced to disable the feature during boot
time.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c                   | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 2b8ee90bb644..623a5f223ff1 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3019,6 +3019,8 @@
 
 	nosoftlockup	[KNL] Disable the soft-lockup detector.
 
+	nosplit_lock_detect	[X86] Disable split lock detection
+
 	nosync		[HW,M68K] Disables sync negotiation for all devices.
 
 	nowatchdog	[KNL] Disable both lockup detectors, i.e.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 28cc6891ba48..959ebf25beda 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <asm/microcode_intel.h>
 #include <asm/hwcap2.h>
 #include <asm/elf.h>
+#include <asm/cmdline.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 #include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -34,6 +35,8 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_test_ctl_cache);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(msr_test_ctl_cache);
 
+static bool split_lock_detect_enable;
+
 /*
  * Just in case our CPU detection goes bad, or you have a weird system,
  * allow a way to override the automatic disabling of MPX.
@@ -659,9 +662,15 @@ static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
 static void split_lock_update_msr(void)
 {
-	/* Enable split lock detection */
-	msr_set_bit(MSR_TEST_CTL, TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_SHIFT);
-	this_cpu_or(msr_test_ctl_cache, TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
+	if (split_lock_detect_enable) {
+		/* Enable split lock detection */
+		msr_set_bit(MSR_TEST_CTL, TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_SHIFT);
+		this_cpu_or(msr_test_ctl_cache, TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
+	} else {
+		/* Disable split lock detection */
+		msr_clear_bit(MSR_TEST_CTL, TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_SHIFT);
+		this_cpu_and(msr_test_ctl_cache, ~TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
+	}
 }
 
 static void init_split_lock_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
@@ -1060,7 +1069,15 @@ cpu_dev_register(intel_cpu_dev);
 static void __init set_split_lock_detect(void)
 {
 	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
-	pr_info("enabled\n");
+
+	if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line,
+				     "nosplit_lock_detect")) {
+		split_lock_detect_enable = false;
+		pr_info("disabled\n");
+	} else {
+		split_lock_detect_enable = true;
+		pr_info("enabled\n");
+	}
 }
 
 void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-- 
2.19.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24 19:32 [PATCH v8 00/15] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25 17:12   ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] x86/msr-index: Define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY and split lock detection bit Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  5:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 19:01     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25 19:47       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 19:51         ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25 20:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 20:22             ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-26  6:00               ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  0:12                 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection by MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection on Icelake mobile processor Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] x86/split_lock: Define MSR TEST_CTL register Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  6:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 19:48     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  6:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25  7:29   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] kvm/x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST_CTL Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  7:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-27 12:20     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-28  7:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-28  7:34         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-29  7:31           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-29  5:21         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-24 19:33 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by default Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  7:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-06 21:39     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25 10:52   ` David Laight
2019-04-25 10:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 11:13       ` David Laight
2019-04-25 11:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 13:04         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-07 20:48       ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-24 19:33 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2019-04-24 19:33 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to enable/disable split lock detection during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-04-25  6:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06  0:21     ` Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1556134382-58814-15-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®