From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: fix potential null pointer dereference on pointer dev
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 11:14:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1557479671.7859.2.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190509160036.19433-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Hi Colin,
[added Bartosz to Cc:]
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 17:00 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Pointer dev is being dereferenced when passed to the inlined
> functon dev_name, however, dev is later being null checked.
> Thus there is a potential null pointer dereference on a null
> dev. Fix this by performing the null check on dev before
> dereferencing it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check")
> Fixes: 6691dffab0ab ("reset: add support for non-DT systems")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 81ea77cba123..83f1a1d5ee67 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -691,12 +691,13 @@ __reset_control_get_from_lookup(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
> {
> const struct reset_control_lookup *lookup;
> struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
> - const char *dev_id = dev_name(dev);
> + const char *dev_id;
> struct reset_control *rstc = NULL;
>
> if (!dev)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Thank you for the patch. I think this check should be removed instead,
though, as __reset_control_get_from_lookup is only ever called from
__reset_control_get, right after checking dev->of_node. So dev can not
be NULL here.
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-09 16:00 Colin King
2019-05-10 9:14 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2019-05-10 9:16 ` Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1557479671.7859.2.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®