From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4353DC468BD for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FEC20825 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730728AbfFGQfR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:35:17 -0400 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:53691 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728595AbfFGQfR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:35:17 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=xylophone) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1hZHpd-0003Ry-M5; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:35:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1559925309.21054.9.camel@codethink.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/69] 4.14.124-stable review From: Ben Hutchings To: Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:35:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190607162722.GA21998@roeck-us.net> References: <20190607153848.271562617@linuxfoundation.org> <20190607161102.GA19615@roeck-us.net> <20190607161627.GA9920@kroah.com> <20190607162722.GA21998@roeck-us.net> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 09:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:11:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.124 release. > > > > There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun 09 Jun 2019 03:37:08 PM UTC. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'btrfs_add_link': > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6590:27: error: invalid initializer > > >    struct timespec64 now = current_time(&parent_inode->vfs_inode); > > >                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~ For 4.14 the type of "now" should be struct timespec. > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6592:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_mtime = now; > > >                                    ^ > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6593:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_ctime = now; > > >                                    ^ > > > > What arch?  This builds for me here.  odd... > > > > arm, i386, m68k, mips, parisc, xtensa, ppc, sh4 > > It was originally seen with v4.14.123-69-gcc46c1204f89 last night, > but I confirmed that v4.14.123-70-g94c5316fb246 is still affected. All 32-bit architectures are affected; on 64-bit architectures timespec64 is a macro expanding to timespec. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom